Having been involved in California Politics for years, I saw what happened when Prop 14 passed. Prop 14 is the jungle primary.
Just last year – 25 districts had no Republican File and about 45 California Districts had no Republican in the runoff. Loser RINO’s like Keickhefer are making the same arguments I heard over 15 years ago for Prop 14 (California’s Version).
In California – there have been almost no Republicans make the runoff for any Statewide office Since Prop 14 passed. When now Vice President Kamala Harris got elected to the senate, she was in the runoff with another democrat.
Ben Keichhefer is indeed a malignant cancer within the Nevada GOP and appears to want to get revenge on every conservative that has ever criticized him. Unfortunately for Keickhefer, Prop 14 has not moderated California Politics – it has moved it dramatically leftward. This shreds his fantasy regarding how he could get more squishes like himself elected.
Having looked at Nevada Politics for a bit over the last few years, I am making a list of people that appear to believe that being like democrats is an effective way to govern as a Republican. Heidi Gansert – who I voted for – is one example. Jill Tolles is another – despite living in a safe R seat (like Ben).
Ben’s jungle primary bill is called SB121. Let him and the others know how you feel about it. While I am at it, I included a few more “Republican” Senators for you to contact as well.
James Stettlemeyer? Ben Kieckhefer? What is your problem? Do you think Steve Sisolak deserves a bailout for his disastrous bungling of COVID? Do you think you can just hammer industry and then ask Donald Trump to print a couple billion to cover it all?
It looks like the Nevada GOP Caucus needs Right On Daily Nevada. With the Ralston report being owned by their never-trumper donors, it appears there is a vacuum in Nevada.
Nevada Families for FreedomState Affiliate national Eagle Forum, 46th Anniversary186 Ryndon Unit 12, Elko, Nevada 89801, 775-397-6859, Sparks 775-356-0105www.nevadafamilies.org, Janine Hansen email@example.comJuly 13, 2020, In the Year of Our Lord, U.S. Constitution Art. VII, 10:00pmWhen you forward please delete bottom portion which says unsubscribe or someone will unsubscribe for you. Thank you for Acknowledgement.
Tonight, Senator Ira Hansen made a powerful statement on the floor of the Nevada State Senate about the Governor’s One-Size Fits All Dictatorial Policies on Covid-19 that are destroying the economy of the State.You can listen to his short statement at the Legislature’s site: Video’s of Archived Meetings. https://www.leg.state.nv.us/Video/ At 6:10:18, near the very end of the July 13th archived meeting video you can hear Senator Ira Hansen’s remarks.He made these points:
- The Governors one-size-fits-all dictatorial mandates does not allow local governments and individual businesses to determine their local policies which are appropriate.
- The Governor or his staff are now calling mayors and county commissioners telling them that the Governor will cut their funding if they do not comply with his edicts.
- The Governor has now created an OSHA hotline for people to spy on their neighbors and businesses to see if they are complying or face forced closure or huge fines.
- The Governor has targeted bars and churches inordinately.
- He said he had driven by the Nugget and GSR resort in Reno and Sparks and the parking lots were full. People are anxious to participate in the economy.
- Make no mistake the economy has everything to do with the special session and the taxes that are collected.
- We need to have a discussion of this issue of the Governor’s policies on Covid-19 during this Legislature.
- We need to eliminate this one-size fits all dictatorial attitude in Nevada.We need to support Senator Ira Hansen’s opposition to the current Dictator Governor Sisolak’s policies.Thank Senator Ira Hansen for his courage: firstname.lastname@example.orgMESSAGE to all other Senators: (especially the Republicans) No Republicans stood to back Senator Hansen’s comments. Two Democrats stood to oppose him.Message: We agree with Senator Hansen’s remarks on the floor of the Senate. Please consider as Legislators the extreme damage to our state’s economy that Governor Sisolak’s one-size-fits-all dictatorial policies on Covid-19 are causing. Local elected officials are capable of responsible action and are closer to the people. It is because businesses are closed that we have this extreme economic devastation to our state, as well as to the citizens and businesses of Nevada. You can’t collect taxes if businesses are closed or out of business and 25% of Nevadans are unemployed. Open up our state. (or write your own message) See article on economic devastation below.All Senate Republicans except Senator Hansen:Heidi.Gansert@sen.state.nv.us, Pete.Goicoechea@sen.state.nv.us, Scott.Hammond@sen.state.nv.us, Joe.Hardy@sen.state.nv.us, Ben.Kieckhefer@sen.state.nv.us, Keith.Pickard@sen.state.nv.us, James.Settelmeyer@sen.state.nv.usSenate Democrats:Chris.Brooks@sen.state.nv.us, Yvanna.Cancella@sen.state.nv.us, Moises.Denis@sen.state.nv.us, Marilyn.DonderoLoop@sen.state.nv.us, Dallas.Harris@sen.state.nv.us, James.Ohrenschall@sen.state.nv.us, Melanie.Scheible@sen.state.nv.us, David.Parks@sen.state.nv.us, Julia.Ratti@sen.state.nv.us, Pat.Spearman@sen.state.nv.us, Marcia.Washington@sen.state.nv.us, Joyce.Woodhouse@sen.state.nv.usNevada hardship index: 35.29.Rank 1.Unemployment: 25.3%Mortgage delinquency: 9.99%Please go the link to see the state by state rankings.www.zerohedge.com
Well – it looks like a bunch of “Republicans” in the legislature are in need of loving, the kind of loving that only the Right On Daily Blog can give RINO’s.
Nevada Families for FreedomState Affiliate national Eagle Forum, 46th Anniversary186 Ryndon Unit 12, Elko, Nevada 89801, 775-397-6859, Sparks 775-356-0105www.nevadafamilies.org, Janine Hansen email@example.comJuly 16, 2020, In the Year of Our Lord, U.S. Constitution Art. VII, 10:07pmWhen you forward please delete bottom portion which says unsubscribe or someone will unsubscribe for you. Thank you for Acknowledgement.
Why Elect Republicans When They Vote Like Democrats?After you read my explanation of SB3 below and what happened yesterday, my question is this. Why vote for Republicans when they vote like Democrats? Contact the Republican Senators and Assemblymen who voted for SB3 and ask them that question.Yesterday during the Special Session of the Nevada Legislature, the Senate voted 19-2 for SB3 with only 2 Republicans Senators Hansen and Hardy, voting No. SB3 passed the Assembly 32 to 10 with only 6 of 13 Republicans, Assemblymen Chris Edwards, John Ellison, John Hambrick, Alexis Hansen, Lisa Krasner, and Jim Wheeler, voting No. Democrats Richard Carillo, Skip Daly, Ozzie Fumo, and Greg Smith also voted No.MESSAGE:Why did you vote with the Democrats on SB3 against mining and the rural counties which are overwhelmingly Republican? We expect you to vote to uphold the two-thirds requirement in the Nevada Constitution for raising taxes even if you lose. Please stand for principle. (or write you own message).Republican Senators voting YES on SB3 like the Democrats: Heidi.Gansert@sen.state.nv.us, Pete.Goicoechea@sen.state.nv.us, Scott.Hammond@sen.state.nv.us, Ben.Kieckhefer@sen.state.nv.us, Keith.Pickard@sen.state.nv.us, James.Settelmeyer@sen.state.nv.usRepublican Assemblymen voting YES on SB3 like the Democrats: Gregory.Hafen@asm.state.nv.us, Melissa.Hardy@asm.state.nv.us, Al.Kramer@asm.state.nv.us, GlenLeavitt@asm.state.nv.us, Tom.Roberts@asm.state.nv.us, Robin.Titus@asm.state.nv.us, Jill.Tolles@asm.state.nv.us,Republican Senators and Assemblyman voting NO on SB3: Thank them for voting NO on SB3 like Republicans should!Ira.Hansen@sen.state.nv.us, Joe.Hardy@sen.state.nv.us, Chris.Edwards@asm.state.nv.us, John.Ellison@asm.state.nv.us, John.Hambrick@asm.state.nv.us, Lisa.Krasner@asm.state.nv.us,Alexis.Hansen@asm.state.nv.us, Jim.Wheeler@asmstate.nv.usSB3 copy of the bill: https://www.leg.state.nv.us/Session/31st2020Special/Bills/SB/SB3_R1.pdfYou can view the floor statements near the end of the sessions for both the Senate and the Assembly: https://www.leg.state.nv.us/Video/SB3 Requires the mines for the “net proceeds of minerals” tax to pay their taxes a year in advance before they ever make any money. How would other businesses do if they had to pay their taxes a year before they are operating for that year or making any money? In his opposition on the Senate Floor Senator Ira Hansen said that in his opinion this was unconstitutional because the Nevada Constitution requires a fair and equitable tax system. If all businesses had to pay a year in advance then this would be fair and equitable, but the Legislature is singling out one industry as it is only being imposed on mining. Small mines may have to borrow the money to be able to pay their taxes and it could certainly make it impossible for them to operate putting them out of business. This acceleration of the mining tax will be for 2021, 22 and 23 and then revert to the former method of payment. The Legislative Counsel Bureau sided with the Democrats and against the 2/3rds voting requirement for raising taxes. More below under Settelmeyer.SB3: Currently, the state highway fund gets 75% of the money from the government services tax when you register you vehicle and the state general fund gets 25%. This bill changes that so that the general fund gets 100% of the tax money and the highway fund nothing for one year. This will have a tremendous impact on construction jobs which will be lost because of the loss of funding for the highway fund. The bill also provides for the Nevada Dept. of Taxation to create an amnesty program for people who owe back taxes so that if they pay their taxes in full, they will not have to pay any interest or fees. They expect to get about 1/3 of people to pay, raising close to $30 million.Republican minority leader Senator Settelmeyer stated that in 2010 almost the exact legislation was passed and needed a 2/3 votes. Why in 2020 does the bill not require a 2/3 vote? Was the Legislative Counsel Bureau wrong in 2010? Or is this another challenge to the 2/3 vote requirement in the Nevada Constitution to pass a tax or fee? He asked if it was designed to support the court case that was currently in the courts, which the Republicans brought from the last session when a bill came to the Senate Floor with a requirement for 2/3 vote did not pass and then was brought back within an hour without the 2/3rds requirement and passed. Senator Hardy made the same points. Although Senator Settelmeyer still voted for SB3 and Senator Hardy voted No on SB3. Kevin Powers of the Legislative Counsel Bureau sided with the Democrats and against the 2/3rds voting requirement for raising taxes.On the Assembly Floor the public testimony by Leftist-Socialists paid lobbyists spent their time bashing the mining industry and saying they needed to pay more taxes and that acceleration was not enough. Assemblywoman Alexis Hansen gave a stirring defense of the mining industry. She reminded the body that mining also pays many other taxes and is the major industry in most of the rural counties. That mining creates well paying jobs averaging $90,000 a year. You can hear her at the link above. Assemblywoman Titus also defended mining but voted for SB3.